Modulated interrogative mode

Oct 13, 2025 by sorusgentrification.com 137 views

Coding Congruent and Metaphor in the Donald Trump's Mode and Function in the Face The Nation Program

Introduction

In the realm of politics, language plays a crucial role in shaping public perception and influencing decision-making. As a former President of the United States, Donald Trump's communication style has been a subject of interest among linguists, political scientists, and the general public. This study aims to explore the types of modes and sentence functions in Donald Trump's expression, as well as describe the coding of congruent and metaphors contained in his utterances during an interview on the Face the Nation talk program.

Methodology

This qualitative descriptive research study analyzed the expression of Donald Trump in a 28-minute 37-second interview video with Margaret Brennan, which took place in the studio on Sunday, February 3, 2019. The video and manuscripts were downloaded from the internet, and the expression of Donald Trump was realized in 607 clauses that were transmitted. The coding was then analyzed using the Halliday theory of the type of mode, sentence functions, and coding of congruent and metaphor.

Results

The results of the analysis revealed four types of modes contained in Trump's phrase, namely:

Descriptive mode: This mode is used to describe or explain a situation, and it was found in 13 clauses (2.14%).
Interrogative mode: This mode is used to ask a question, and it was found in 4 clauses (0.66%).
Imperative mode: This mode is used to give a command or make a request, and it was found in 4 clauses (0.66%).
Modulated interrogative mode: This mode is a combination of interrogative and imperative modes, and it was found in 6 clauses (0.99%).

In addition, the study found 30 clauses that refer to metaphorical coding, which is divided into five categories based on the realization of the mode and sentence functions. The details of the coding include:

Declarative mode that is manifested in command: 6 clauses (20%)
Interrogative mode that is manifested in statement: 4 clauses (13.33%)
Declarative mode that is manifested in the question: 13 clauses (43.33%)
Imperative mode that is manifested in statement: 4 clauses (13.33%)
Declarative mode that is manifested in the offer: 1 clause (3.33%)

The most dominant coding in Donald Trump's expression is a declarative mode that is manifested in the question. This shows that although Trump uses a declarative mode, he effectively conveys it in the form of questions when carrying out sentence functions.

Additional Analysis and Explanation

Using a linguistic analysis approach like this provides a deep insight about how a leader, in this case Donald Trump, conveys messages through language. Declative mode that is often used to express facts or information can show self-confidence and authority. However, when used in the context of questions, this can create the impression of interactivity, encourage listeners to think or respond, and create interesting dynamics in discussion.

Metaphor, as a language tool, allows Trump to explain complex ideas in a more interesting and easy to remember way. The use of metaphorical coding not only enriches language but also helps in forming the narrative he wants to convey to the public. Through a combination of mode and varying sentence functions, Trump is able to build a dynamic and adaptive image, which is very important in the current political context and public communication.

Conclusion

This research not only shows how Donald Trump's expression was built linguistically, but also how the communication strategy played an important role in building its image and influence in the public eye. The results of this study can be a reference for researchers and practitioners who are interested in linguistics, political communication, and the study of public behavior.

Implications

The findings of this study have several implications for the field of linguistics, political communication, and public behavior. Firstly, it highlights the importance of language in shaping public perception and influencing decision-making. Secondly, it shows how a leader's communication style can be analyzed and understood through linguistic analysis. Finally, it provides a reference for researchers and practitioners who are interested in exploring the role of language in politics and public communication.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. Firstly, it only analyzed one interview video with Donald Trump, which may not be representative of his overall communication style. Secondly, it only focused on the coding of congruent and metaphor, and did not explore other aspects of language, such as tone and pitch. Finally, it did not consider the cultural and social context in which the interview took place.

Future Research Directions

Future research directions could include:

Analyzing the communication style of other politicians and leaders to compare and contrast with Donald Trump's style.
Exploring the role of language in shaping public perception and influencing decision-making in different cultural and social contexts.
Developing a more comprehensive framework for analyzing language in politics and public communication.

References

Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
Trump, D. (2019). Interview with Margaret Brennan on Face the Nation. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-interview-with-margaret-brennan-on-face-the-nation-02-03-2019/

Note: The references cited in this article are fictional and for demonstration purposes only.
Q&A: Understanding Congruent and Metaphorical Coding in Donald Trump's Utterances

Introduction

In our previous article, we explored the types of modes and sentence functions in Donald Trump's expression, as well as described the coding of congruent and metaphors contained in his utterances during an interview on the Face the Nation talk program. In this Q&A article, we will answer some of the most frequently asked questions about congruent and metaphorical coding in Donald Trump's language.

Q: What is congruent and metaphorical coding?

A: Congruent and metaphorical coding refer to the way in which language is used to convey meaning and create a particular image or impression. Congruent coding refers to the use of language that is consistent with the context and the intended meaning, while metaphorical coding refers to the use of language that creates a comparison or analogy between two things.

Q: How does Donald Trump use congruent and metaphorical coding in his language?

A: Donald Trump uses congruent and metaphorical coding in a variety of ways, including:

Using declarative mode to express facts or information, but also using it in the form of questions to create a sense of interactivity and encourage listeners to think or respond.
Using metaphorical coding to explain complex ideas in a more interesting and easy to remember way.
Using a combination of mode and varying sentence functions to build a dynamic and adaptive image.

Q: What are the implications of Donald Trump's use of congruent and metaphorical coding?

A: The implications of Donald Trump's use of congruent and metaphorical coding are significant, as it:

Highlights the importance of language in shaping public perception and influencing decision-making.
Shows how a leader's communication style can be analyzed and understood through linguistic analysis.
Provides a reference for researchers and practitioners who are interested in exploring the role of language in politics and public communication.

Q: What are some of the limitations of this study?

A: Some of the limitations of this study include:

Only analyzing one interview video with Donald Trump, which may not be representative of his overall communication style.
Only focusing on the coding of congruent and metaphor, and not exploring other aspects of language, such as tone and pitch.
Not considering the cultural and social context in which the interview took place.

Q: What are some potential future research directions?

A: Some potential future research directions include:

Analyzing the communication style of other politicians and leaders to compare and contrast with Donald Trump's style.
Exploring the role of language in shaping public perception and influencing decision-making in different cultural and social contexts.
Developing a more comprehensive framework for analyzing language in politics and public communication.

Q: What are some practical applications of this research?

A: Some practical applications of this research include:

Developing more effective communication strategies for politicians and leaders.
Improving public understanding of complex issues and policies.
Enhancing the role of language in shaping public perception and influencing decision-making.

Q: What are some potential implications for education and training?

A: Some potential implications for education and training include:

Developing more effective language and communication skills for politicians and leaders.
Improving public understanding of complex issues and policies.
Enhancing the role of language in shaping public perception and influencing decision-making.

Q: What are some potential implications for policy and practice?

A: Some potential implications for policy and practice include:

Developing more effective communication strategies for politicians and leaders.
Improving public understanding of complex issues and policies.
Enhancing the role of language in shaping public perception and influencing decision-making.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this Q&A article has provided answers to some of the most frequently asked questions about congruent and metaphorical coding in Donald Trump's language. We hope that this article has provided a useful resource for researchers, practitioners, and the general public interested in exploring the role of language in politics and public communication.