Notary Education and Training

Oct 13, 2025 by sorusgentrification.com 12 views

Introduction

Changes in the contents of the notary deed without notice to one of the parties are actions that violate the law. In the case studied, the notary with the First Party, Bonar Saragih, and Witnesses, Mangapul Hutahaean, made changes to the notary deed and did not provide information about the change to the second party, Daniel Freddy Sinambela. As a result, Daniel Freddy Sinambela suffered unilateral losses. This problem is the basis for criminalizing a notary with accusations of making fake letters or falsifying letters based on Article 264 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. In this case, the notary must be responsible for authentic deeds that have a criminal element.

The notary's actions in this case are a clear example of the importance of transparency and accountability in the notary profession. Notaries are public officials who play a crucial role in ensuring that legal documents are authentic and accurate. When a notary makes changes to a deed without the knowledge and approval of one party, it raises serious concerns about the integrity of the notary profession and the legal system as a whole.

Research Methods

This type of research combines an empirical and normative juridical approach. This study uses descriptive analysis methods, by examining literature legal materials and normative juridical approaches. In this context, research will examine the decision of the Supreme Court Number 1003K/PID/2015 and link them with legislation, legal documents, and literature relating to the formulation of the problem. In addition, to support the results of this study, field research was conducted through interviews with relevant speakers.

The use of descriptive analysis methods allows for a detailed examination of the case study and the relevant legal materials. By examining the decision of the Supreme Court and linking it with legislation and literature, this study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal consequences of changes in the contents of the notary deed without the approval of the parties.

Legal Consequences

Changes in the contents of the deed carried out by a notary without the knowledge and approval of one party raises an element of counterfeiting. The notary involved in the action against the law is proven to make every deed that is not in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations can be subject to sanctions and responsibilities. The notary action can be held accountable based on administrative law, civil law, and criminal law.

Civil Law

Notary can be held in a civil accountable accountability, such as reimbursement of costs, compensation, and interest on losses suffered by the disadvantaged party. This is in line with the principles of justice and fairness, which require that those who suffer losses as a result of the notary's actions should be compensated.

Administrative Law

Notary who violates administrative law provisions can be subject to administrative sanctions. The sanctions can be in the form of oral or written reprimands, temporary dismissals, respectful dismissal, or disrespectful dismissal. This is in line with the principles of accountability and transparency, which require that public officials, including notaries, should be held accountable for their actions.

Criminal Law

Criminal Responsibility for Notary for the Deed he made is not regulated in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Position. However, notaries can be subject to criminal accountability if proven to have committed a criminal act, including falsifying letters. This is in line with the principles of justice and fairness, which require that those who commit crimes should be held accountable.

Conclusion

This case highlights the importance of notary compliance with applicable legal procedures, as well as the need for transparency in every change in the deed made. Notary as a public official must act with integrity and professionalism, to prevent acts against the law that can harm other parties. Strict law enforcement of violations is important to maintain public trust in the notary institution and the legal system in Indonesia.

In conclusion, the case study of the Supreme Court Decision No. 1003K/PID/2015 highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in the notary profession. Notaries must comply with applicable legal procedures and ensure that changes to deeds are made with the knowledge and approval of all parties involved. Failure to do so can result in serious consequences, including civil, administrative, and criminal liability.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Notary Education and Training: Notaries should receive regular education and training on the importance of transparency and accountability in the notary profession.
Notary Code of Conduct: A code of conduct for notaries should be established to ensure that notaries act with integrity and professionalism.
Strict Law Enforcement: Strict law enforcement of violations is necessary to maintain public trust in the notary institution and the legal system in Indonesia.
Public Awareness: Public awareness campaigns should be conducted to educate the public about the importance of transparency and accountability in the notary profession.

By implementing these recommendations, the notary profession can ensure that notaries act with integrity and professionalism, and that the public trust in the notary institution and the legal system in Indonesia is maintained.

Q: What is the significance of the Supreme Court Decision No. 1003K/PID/2015 in the context of notary deeds?

A: The Supreme Court Decision No. 1003K/PID/2015 is significant because it highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in the notary profession. The decision emphasizes that notaries must comply with applicable legal procedures and ensure that changes to deeds are made with the knowledge and approval of all parties involved.

Q: What are the legal consequences of changes in the contents of the notary deed without the approval of the parties?

A: The legal consequences of changes in the contents of the notary deed without the approval of the parties can include civil, administrative, and criminal liability. Notaries who make changes to deeds without the knowledge and approval of one party can be held accountable for reimbursement of costs, compensation, and interest on losses suffered by the disadvantaged party.

Q: Can notaries be held criminally accountable for changes in the contents of the notary deed without the approval of the parties?

A: Yes, notaries can be held criminally accountable for changes in the contents of the notary deed without the approval of the parties. If proven to have committed a criminal act, including falsifying letters, notaries can be subject to criminal accountability.

Q: What is the role of the notary in ensuring the authenticity and accuracy of legal documents?

A: The notary plays a crucial role in ensuring the authenticity and accuracy of legal documents. Notaries are public officials who are responsible for verifying the identity of parties involved in a transaction and ensuring that all parties understand the terms and conditions of the agreement.

Q: How can notaries prevent acts against the law that can harm other parties?

A: Notaries can prevent acts against the law that can harm other parties by ensuring that they comply with applicable legal procedures and that changes to deeds are made with the knowledge and approval of all parties involved. Notaries must also act with integrity and professionalism, and be transparent in their actions.

Q: What is the importance of strict law enforcement of violations in the notary profession?

A: Strict law enforcement of violations is important to maintain public trust in the notary institution and the legal system in Indonesia. By holding notaries accountable for their actions, the public can have confidence in the notary profession and the legal system as a whole.

Q: How can the public ensure that notaries act with integrity and professionalism?

A: The public can ensure that notaries act with integrity and professionalism by:

Verifying the identity of the notary and ensuring that they are licensed to practice.
Ensuring that the notary provides clear and accurate information about the terms and conditions of the agreement.
Ensuring that the notary complies with applicable legal procedures.
Reporting any suspicious activity or concerns to the relevant authorities.

By taking these steps, the public can help to maintain the integrity and professionalism of the notary profession.