Optimization of milling time

Oct 13, 2025 by sorusgentrification.com 80 views

Effects of Variation of Planetary Ball Mill (PBM) Time Variations on NDFEB Powder on Microstructure, Physical Properties, and Magnets

Introduction

The development of permanent magnets from rare earth materials, such as Neodymium Iron Boron (NDFEB), has been a significant area of research in recent years. The properties of these magnets, including their magnetic strength, durability, and resistance to corrosion, make them essential components in various industrial applications. However, the production of high-quality NDFEB magnets requires careful control of the manufacturing process, including the milling time and method. In this study, we investigate the effects of varying the milling time using a Planetary Ball Mill (PBM) on the physical and magnetic properties of NDFEB powder.

Experimental Methodology

In this experiment, two milling methods were applied: wet grinding and dry grinding, with a ball ratio of 1:10. For wet milling, the powder was dried for 10 hours at 60 ° C in a vacuum condition with a pressure of 11 MB. Furthermore, 5% Celuna (WE-518) was added based on the weight of the NDFEB powder for the printing process. Printing was done with the help of a magnetic field with a pressure of 25 kgf/cm². The final stage of this process was curing at 180 ° C (in a vacuum with a pressure of 11 MB) for 1 hour.

Characterization Techniques

The magnetic characterization produced includes XRD analysis, density flux measurements using Gaussmeters, as well as measuring powder density, bulk density, NDFEB morphology using SEM, and analysis of particle size with PSA. The measurement results were used to determine the optimal PBM milling time.

Results and Discussion

The measurement results showed that the optimal PBM milling time was 3 hours. In this condition, the bulk density value for wet mill reached 5,896 g/cm³ and for dry grinding of 5,981 g/cm³. In addition, powder density recorded 7.75 g/cm³ (wet milling) and 7.79 g/cm³ (dry milling). The particle size distribution showed 10.74 μm for wet grinding and 13.12 μm for dry grinding. Density flux was also measured by a value of 1058.2 Gauss in dry mill and 977.5 Gauss in wet milling.

Through XRD analysis, it appeared that the resulting powder was undergoing phase and microstructure changes. The results showed that the longer the milling time, the number of pores in the magnetic structure produced was less.

Analysis

The effect of milling time on the magnetic and physical properties of NDFEB provides an important insight into how process parameters can affect the final outcome. In the grinding process, changes in mechanical energy received by powder can cause variations in micro structure and interactions between particles. Along with the increase in milling time, there will be a reduction in particle size and reduction of pores that can increase density and magnetic flux.

From the measurement results, it was known that dry milling gave a higher density value than wet grinding. This may be caused by loss of solvents and evaporation that can reduce the volume of powder when wet grinding.

Conclusion

The selection of the right method and time of milling in making NDFEB is very crucial in determining the physical and magnetic properties of the final product. These findings are not only relevant to practical applications in the field of magnetic material, but also provide a strong scientific basis for further research on optimization of other rare soil magnetic manufacturing processes. Through this approach, it is expected that the quality and performance of the magnetism produced can be more leverage, and meet the various needs of modern industry applications.

Recommendations

Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Optimization of milling time: The optimal PBM milling time of 3 hours should be used as a reference for future studies.
Selection of milling method: Dry milling should be preferred over wet grinding due to its higher density value.
Further research: Further research should be conducted to optimize other process parameters, such as ball ratio and grinding speed, to improve the quality and performance of NDFEB magnets.

Limitations

This study has several limitations that should be addressed in future research:

Limited sample size: The sample size used in this study was limited, and further research should be conducted with a larger sample size to confirm the results.
Limited process parameters: Only two milling methods were used in this study, and further research should be conducted to investigate the effects of other process parameters, such as ball ratio and grinding speed.
Limited characterization techniques: Only a limited number of characterization techniques were used in this study, and further research should be conducted to investigate the effects of other characterization techniques, such as TEM and EDS.

Future Directions

This study provides a strong scientific basis for further research on optimization of other rare soil magnetic manufacturing processes. Future research should focus on:

Optimization of process parameters: Further research should be conducted to optimize other process parameters, such as ball ratio and grinding speed, to improve the quality and performance of NDFEB magnets.
Development of new characterization techniques: New characterization techniques, such as TEM and EDS, should be developed to investigate the effects of process parameters on the microstructure and properties of NDFEB magnets.
Scaling up the process: The process should be scaled up to produce larger quantities of NDFEB magnets with improved quality and performance.
Q&A: Effects of Variation of Planetary Ball Mill (PBM) Time Variations on NDFEB Powder on Microstructure, Physical Properties, and Magnets

Q: What is the main objective of this study?

A: The main objective of this study is to investigate the effects of varying the milling time using a Planetary Ball Mill (PBM) on the physical and magnetic properties of NDFEB powder.

Q: What are the two milling methods used in this study?

A: The two milling methods used in this study are wet grinding and dry grinding, with a ball ratio of 1:10.

Q: What is the optimal PBM milling time found in this study?

A: The optimal PBM milling time found in this study is 3 hours.

Q: What are the physical and magnetic properties measured in this study?

A: The physical and magnetic properties measured in this study include bulk density, powder density, particle size distribution, density flux, and XRD analysis.

Q: What is the effect of milling time on the magnetic and physical properties of NDFEB?

A: The effect of milling time on the magnetic and physical properties of NDFEB is that longer milling times result in a reduction in particle size and a reduction in pores, which can increase density and magnetic flux.

Q: Why is dry milling preferred over wet grinding?

A: Dry milling is preferred over wet grinding because it gives a higher density value.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study include a limited sample size, limited process parameters, and limited characterization techniques.

Q: What are the future directions of this study?

A: The future directions of this study include optimization of process parameters, development of new characterization techniques, and scaling up the process.

Q: What are the practical applications of this study?

A: The practical applications of this study include the production of high-quality NDFEB magnets for various industrial applications.

Q: What are the implications of this study for the field of magnetic materials?

A: The implications of this study for the field of magnetic materials are that it provides a strong scientific basis for further research on optimization of other rare soil magnetic manufacturing processes.

Q: What are the potential benefits of this study?

A: The potential benefits of this study include improved quality and performance of NDFEB magnets, which can meet the various needs of modern industry applications.

Q: What are the potential challenges of this study?

A: The potential challenges of this study include the need for further research to optimize other process parameters, the development of new characterization techniques, and the scaling up of the process.

Q: What are the potential future research directions?

A: The potential future research directions include the investigation of the effects of other process parameters, such as ball ratio and grinding speed, on the physical and magnetic properties of NDFEB, the development of new characterization techniques, and the scaling up of the process.

Q: What are the potential implications of this study for the field of materials science?

A: The potential implications of this study for the field of materials science are that it provides a strong scientific basis for further research on the optimization of other rare soil magnetic manufacturing processes, and it highlights the importance of process parameters in determining the physical and magnetic properties of materials.