Relationship between Hobbes and the 1945 Constitution before Amendments

Oct 13, 2025 by sorusgentrification.com 111 views

Exploring the Concept of Power: Thomas Hobbes and Presidential in Indonesia (Before Amendments)

Introduction

The concept of power has been a central theme in political philosophy, with various thinkers contributing to its understanding. Thomas Hobbes, a 17th-century British philosopher, is famous for his theory of Leviathan, an absolute country that is needed to maintain order and security in society. In this article, we will explore the concept of power in Hobbes's thinking, compare it with a presidential system in Indonesia based on the 1945 Constitution before the amendment, and examine its practice during the era of guided democracy under the leadership of President Soekarno (1959-1966).

Hobbes Power Concept

Thomas Hobbes, a prominent figure in the history of political philosophy, is known for his theory of Leviathan, an absolute country that is needed to maintain order and security in society. In the view of Hobbes, humans are selfish creatures driven by the desire to survive and maximize personal satisfaction. Without a strong power, humans will live in a condition of "war all against all" (Bellum Omnium Contra Omnes) which is full of chaos and violence. To avoid this, Hobbes argues that power must be centered on a single ruler who has absolute authority. This concept is reflected in his famous phrase, "the life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short" (Hobbes, 1651).

Hobbes's theory of Leviathan is based on the idea that humans are inherently self-interested and that, without a strong central authority, society would descend into chaos and violence. He argues that the only way to prevent this is to establish a strong, centralized government that has absolute authority over its citizens. This government, or Leviathan, would be responsible for maintaining order and security in society, and would be the ultimate authority in all matters.

Presidential in Indonesia (1945 Constitution before Amendment)

The 1945 Constitution before the amendment gave great power to the President. The President of the Republic of Indonesia acts as the Head of State and Head of Government, has broad authority in running the government, including issuing government regulations, forming a cabinet, and establishing state policies. This constitution was adopted in 1945, after Indonesia gained independence from the Netherlands, and it established the framework for the country's government and institutions.

The 1945 Constitution before the amendment was a significant document in Indonesian history, as it established the country's first government and institutions. It also provided for a presidential system, with the President serving as both Head of State and Head of Government. This system was based on the idea that the President would have broad authority to make decisions and implement policies, and that the government would be responsible for maintaining order and security in society.

Guided Democracy and the Concept of Soekarno's Power

The Guided Democracy Era (1959-1966) in Indonesia marked the period in which President Soekarno consolidated power in a way that resembled the concept of Leviathan Hobbes. Soekarno implemented a "guided democracy" policy that put forward the role of political parties and government institutions that were in line with his thoughts. This policy was based on the idea that the President would have absolute authority to make decisions and implement policies, and that the government would be responsible for maintaining order and security in society.

Soekarno's guided democracy policy was a significant development in Indonesian history, as it marked a shift towards a more authoritarian form of government. Under this policy, the President had absolute authority to make decisions and implement policies, and the government was responsible for maintaining order and security in society. This policy was based on the idea that the President would have absolute authority to make decisions and implement policies, and that the government would be responsible for maintaining order and security in society.

Relationship between Hobbes and the 1945 Constitution before Amendments

There are some similarities between the concept of Hobbes power and the presidential system practiced in Indonesia based on the 1945 Constitution before the amendment:

*** Centered Power: ** Both Hobbes and the 1945 Constitution before Amendments emphasize the importance of power centered on one person or a single institution. *** Absolute Authority: ** The concept of Leviathan Hobbes and the 1945 Constitution before the amendment provides broad authority to the President, thus allowing decision making and policies that are authoritarian. *** Emphasis on Stability: ** Both Hobbes and presidential systems in Indonesia before amendments have the aim to achieve political stability and national security.

These similarities reflect the idea that both Hobbes and the 1945 Constitution before the amendment emphasize the importance of power centered on one person or a single institution. This is reflected in the practice of guided democracy under Sukarno, where the president has strong control over government and state institutions.

Analysis and Conclusions

The presidential system in Indonesia before the amendment, with power centered on the president, does have similarities with the concept of Hobbes power. This is reflected in the practice of guided democracy under Sukarno, where the president has strong control over government and state institutions. However, keep in mind that the concept of Hobbes and the 1945 Constitution before the amendment has a different context and background.

The analysis of the relationship between Hobbes and the 1945 Constitution before the amendment provides an important perspective in understanding the development of the Indonesian political system. By understanding the concept of Hobbes power and its practice in the Indonesian context, we can be more critical in analyzing the presidential system, as well as assessing the impact of the concentration of power in one person or institution.

Relevance and Implications

This discussion provides an important perspective in understanding the development of the Indonesian political system. By understanding the concept of Hobbes power and its practice in the Indonesian context, we can be more critical in analyzing the presidential system, as well as assessing the impact of the concentration of power in one person or institution. In addition, this understanding can also help us in understanding the dynamics of political in Indonesia and anticipate the potential problems related to the concentration of power.

In conclusion, the concept of power in Thomas Hobbes's thinking and the presidential system in Indonesia before the amendment share some similarities. Both emphasize the importance of power centered on one person or a single institution, and both provide broad authority to the President. However, the context and background of these concepts are different, and the analysis of their relationship provides an important perspective in understanding the development of the Indonesian political system.

References

Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan.

Conclusion

The concept of power in Thomas Hobbes's thinking and the presidential system in Indonesia before the amendment share some similarities. Both emphasize the importance of power centered on one person or a single institution, and both provide broad authority to the President. However, the context and background of these concepts are different, and the analysis of their relationship provides an important perspective in understanding the development of the Indonesian political system.
Q&A: Exploring the Concept of Power: Thomas Hobbes and Presidential in Indonesia (Before Amendments)

Introduction

In our previous article, we explored the concept of power in Thomas Hobbes's thinking and its relationship with the presidential system in Indonesia before the amendment. We discussed the similarities between Hobbes's concept of Leviathan and the presidential system in Indonesia, and how both emphasize the importance of power centered on one person or a single institution. In this Q&A article, we will answer some of the most frequently asked questions about the concept of power in Hobbes's thinking and its relationship with the presidential system in Indonesia.

Q: What is the main idea of Hobbes's concept of Leviathan?

A: The main idea of Hobbes's concept of Leviathan is that humans are inherently self-interested and that, without a strong central authority, society would descend into chaos and violence. He argues that the only way to prevent this is to establish a strong, centralized government that has absolute authority over its citizens.

Q: How does the presidential system in Indonesia before the amendment relate to Hobbes's concept of Leviathan?

A: The presidential system in Indonesia before the amendment has similarities with Hobbes's concept of Leviathan in that both emphasize the importance of power centered on one person or a single institution. The President of Indonesia has broad authority to make decisions and implement policies, and the government is responsible for maintaining order and security in society.

Q: What is the significance of the 1945 Constitution before the amendment in the context of Hobbes's concept of Leviathan?

A: The 1945 Constitution before the amendment is significant in the context of Hobbes's concept of Leviathan because it established a presidential system in Indonesia that has similarities with Hobbes's idea of a strong, centralized government. The Constitution gave the President broad authority to make decisions and implement policies, and the government was responsible for maintaining order and security in society.

Q: How does the concept of guided democracy relate to Hobbes's concept of Leviathan?

A: The concept of guided democracy, implemented by President Soekarno in Indonesia, has similarities with Hobbes's concept of Leviathan in that both emphasize the importance of power centered on one person or a single institution. Soekarno's guided democracy policy gave the President absolute authority to make decisions and implement policies, and the government was responsible for maintaining order and security in society.

Q: What are the implications of the concentration of power in one person or institution?

A: The concentration of power in one person or institution can have significant implications, including the potential for authoritarianism, the suppression of individual rights and freedoms, and the erosion of democratic institutions. It is essential to have a system of checks and balances to prevent the concentration of power and ensure that power is distributed fairly and equitably.

Q: How can we apply the concept of Hobbes's Leviathan to modern-day politics?

A: The concept of Hobbes's Leviathan can be applied to modern-day politics by recognizing the importance of power and the need for a strong, centralized government to maintain order and security in society. However, it is essential to balance this with the need for individual rights and freedoms, and to ensure that power is distributed fairly and equitably.

Q: What are the limitations of Hobbes's concept of Leviathan?

A: The limitations of Hobbes's concept of Leviathan include its emphasis on the importance of power and the need for a strong, centralized government, which can lead to authoritarianism and the suppression of individual rights and freedoms. Additionally, Hobbes's concept of Leviathan is based on a pessimistic view of human nature, which assumes that humans are inherently self-interested and that, without a strong central authority, society would descend into chaos and violence.