Review the use of EPPS in adolescents in Indonesia

Oct 13, 2025 by sorusgentrification.com 81 views

Analysis of the Functioning of the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS) in Adolescents: Challenges and Implications

Introduction

The Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS) is a widely used personality measurement tool designed to uncover the manifestation of needs in individuals. One of the needs measured in EPPS is heterosexual needs, which are essential for understanding human behavior and relationships. However, in Indonesia, the topic of sexuality is still considered taboo, especially among teenagers. This study seeks to understand the extent to which heterosexual needs in EPPS function well in adolescents, given the sensitivity of this topic.

Methodology

This study was conducted by testing the heterosexual needs of EPPS using the Rasch method in 100 high school teenagers aged 15-18 years (52 women and 48 men). The participants were selected from various high schools in Indonesia, and the data was collected using a standardized questionnaire. The Rasch method was used to analyze the data, which allowed for the detection of differential item functioning (DIF) and the assessment of the internal structure validity of the EPPS.

Results

The results of this study showed several important findings:

Detection of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Based on Gender

One Aitem showed significant functional differences based on gender (probability value of 0.0415). This indicates that the biological may be interpreted differently by teenage boys and girls, so it needs to be reviewed. The presence of DIF based on gender suggests that the EPPS may not be measuring heterosexual needs in a way that is consistent across different gender groups.

Internal Structure Validity Test

One Aitem did not meet the ideal measurement model criteria, indicating that it may not measure heterosexual needs appropriately. This finding suggests that the EPPS may not be a reliable instrument for measuring heterosexual needs in adolescents.

Reliability Analysis of Alpha Cronbach

The results of the reliability analysis showed that the quality of the overall interaction between person and Aitem was moderate (r = 0.33). Although the reliability of Aitem to measure heterosexual requirements was quite good (R = 0.80), the reliability of the person who shows the consistency of the response of weak respondents was low (R = 0.38). This indicates that the EPPS measuring instrument in this context has limitations in measuring heterosexual needs accurately and consistently in adolescents.

Implications

The findings of this study have important implications for the use of EPPS in adolescents in Indonesia. First, the use of heterosexual needs of EPPS in adolescents in Indonesia needs to be reviewed. The presence of DIF based on gender and Aitem that is not in accordance with the ideal measurement model indicates the potential bias in measurement. Second, low reliability indicates that this measuring instrument may not be able to provide consistent and reliable results in measuring heterosexual needs in adolescents.

Limitations

This research has several limitations. The number of samples is limited, and further research may be needed with larger and representative samples to confirm this finding. In addition, this research only focuses on psychometric aspects, and needs to be considered broader socio-cultural aspects related to teenage sexuality in Indonesia.

Conclusion

The results of this study provide an important starting point for understanding the challenges in measuring heterosexual needs in adolescents in Indonesia. In the future, it is necessary to develop and validate measuring devices that are more sensitive to the cultural context and gender of Indonesian teenagers, to be able to measure heterosexual needs accurately and useful.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Review the use of EPPS in adolescents in Indonesia: The presence of DIF based on gender and Aitem that is not in accordance with the ideal measurement model indicates the potential bias in measurement. Therefore, it is necessary to review the use of EPPS in adolescents in Indonesia.
Develop and validate new measuring devices: The EPPS measuring instrument in this context has limitations in measuring heterosexual needs accurately and consistently in adolescents. Therefore, it is necessary to develop and validate new measuring devices that are more sensitive to the cultural context and gender of Indonesian teenagers.
Consider broader socio-cultural aspects: This research only focuses on psychometric aspects, and needs to be considered broader socio-cultural aspects related to teenage sexuality in Indonesia.

Future Research Directions

Future research should focus on developing and validating new measuring devices that are more sensitive to the cultural context and gender of Indonesian teenagers. Additionally, research should consider broader socio-cultural aspects related to teenage sexuality in Indonesia. This will help to provide a more accurate and reliable understanding of heterosexual needs in adolescents in Indonesia.

References

Edwards, A. L. (1957). The Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS). New York: Psychological Corporation.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
Smith, R. M. (2002). _ Rasch measurement: Foundations and frontiers_. Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
Q&A: Understanding the Functioning of the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS) in Adolescents

Introduction

The Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS) is a widely used personality measurement tool designed to uncover the manifestation of needs in individuals. However, in Indonesia, the topic of sexuality is still considered taboo, especially among teenagers. This Q&A article aims to provide a deeper understanding of the functioning of the EPPS in adolescents, based on the findings of a recent study.

Q: What is the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS)?

A: The EPPS is a personality measurement tool designed to uncover the manifestation of needs in individuals. It measures 16 different needs, including heterosexual needs, which are essential for understanding human behavior and relationships.

Q: What is the purpose of the EPPS in adolescents?

A: The EPPS is used to measure heterosexual needs in adolescents, which is essential for understanding their behavior and relationships. However, the study found that the EPPS may not be a reliable instrument for measuring heterosexual needs in adolescents.

Q: What are the limitations of the EPPS in adolescents?

A: The study found that the EPPS has several limitations in adolescents, including:

Differential item functioning (DIF) based on gender: The EPPS may not be measuring heterosexual needs in a way that is consistent across different gender groups.
Internal structure validity test: One Aitem did not meet the ideal measurement model criteria, indicating that it may not measure heterosexual needs appropriately.
Reliability analysis of alpha Cronbach: The EPPS measuring instrument in this context has limitations in measuring heterosexual needs accurately and consistently in adolescents.

Q: What are the implications of the study's findings?

A: The study's findings have important implications for the use of EPPS in adolescents in Indonesia. The presence of DIF based on gender and Aitem that is not in accordance with the ideal measurement model indicates the potential bias in measurement. Additionally, low reliability indicates that this measuring instrument may not be able to provide consistent and reliable results in measuring heterosexual needs in adolescents.

Q: What are the recommendations for future research?

A: Based on the study's findings, the following recommendations are made:

Review the use of EPPS in adolescents in Indonesia: The presence of DIF based on gender and Aitem that is not in accordance with the ideal measurement model indicates the potential bias in measurement. Therefore, it is necessary to review the use of EPPS in adolescents in Indonesia.
Develop and validate new measuring devices: The EPPS measuring instrument in this context has limitations in measuring heterosexual needs accurately and consistently in adolescents. Therefore, it is necessary to develop and validate new measuring devices that are more sensitive to the cultural context and gender of Indonesian teenagers.
Consider broader socio-cultural aspects: This research only focuses on psychometric aspects, and needs to be considered broader socio-cultural aspects related to teenage sexuality in Indonesia.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should focus on developing and validating new measuring devices that are more sensitive to the cultural context and gender of Indonesian teenagers. Additionally, research should consider broader socio-cultural aspects related to teenage sexuality in Indonesia. This will help to provide a more accurate and reliable understanding of heterosexual needs in adolescents in Indonesia.

Q: What are the implications for practice?

A: The study's findings have important implications for practice, including:

Reviewing the use of EPPS in adolescents in Indonesia: The presence of DIF based on gender and Aitem that is not in accordance with the ideal measurement model indicates the potential bias in measurement. Therefore, it is necessary to review the use of EPPS in adolescents in Indonesia.
Developing and validating new measuring devices: The EPPS measuring instrument in this context has limitations in measuring heterosexual needs accurately and consistently in adolescents. Therefore, it is necessary to develop and validate new measuring devices that are more sensitive to the cultural context and gender of Indonesian teenagers.

Conclusion

The Q&A article provides a deeper understanding of the functioning of the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS) in adolescents, based on the findings of a recent study. The study's findings have important implications for the use of EPPS in adolescents in Indonesia, and highlight the need for further research to develop and validate new measuring devices that are more sensitive to the cultural context and gender of Indonesian teenagers.