The duration of the assisted program

Oct 13, 2025 by sorusgentrification.com 88 views

Comparative Analysis of Socio-Economic Levels Assured Bitra Farmers and Anorgani Farmers (Case Study of Lubuk Bayas Village, Perbaungan District, Serdang Bedagai Regency)

Introduction

The agricultural sector plays a vital role in the economy of many countries, including Indonesia. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in organic farming as a more sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative to conventional farming methods. However, the adoption of organic farming practices has been hindered by various factors, including limited market access, lack of knowledge and skills, and dependence on chemical fertilizers and pesticides. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the socio-economic levels of organic and inorganic farmers in Lubuk Bayas Village, Perbaungan District, Serdang Bedagai Regency, to identify the differences and similarities between the two groups.

Methodology

This study used a comparative descriptive method with purposive sampling. The sample used was 20 households, consisting of 10 Organic Farmer Households assisted by Bitra and 10 Inorganic Farmers' Households. Data was collected through questionnaires, interviews, observations, and literature studies. The data analysis was conducted using the U Mann Whitney test at a significance level of 0.05 with a two-tail test.

Results

The results of the analysis show that there is no significant difference in the socio-economic level between organic and inorganic farmers. However, the data shows that the socio-economic level of organic farmers respondents is slightly higher than inorganic farmers. This difference is caused by a side job carried out by some organic farmers, such as becoming a Civil Servant (PNS).

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that the Bitra assisted program for organic agriculture in Lubuk Bayas Village has not shown a significant impact on the socio-economic improvement of farmers. Some of the factors that might be the cause are:

The duration of the assisted program: The Bitra assisted program may not run long enough to have a significant impact on the socio-economic improvement of farmers.
Limited market access: Organic farmers may have difficulty in accessing markets that promise higher prices for their products.
Lack of knowledge and skills: Organic farmers may still need further training and guidance to increase knowledge and skills in the management of organic farming.
Dependence on chemical fertilizers and pesticides: Although some organic farmers use organic fertilizers and pesticides, they may still depend on synthetic chemicals to increase yields. This can reduce the economic benefits of organic agriculture.

Recommendation

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Increasing the duration and intensity of the assisted program: The assisted program needs to be extended and strengthened to provide more sustainable support to organic farmers.
Development of market access: It takes efforts to expand market access for organic agricultural products, both through cooperation with marketing institutions and by building its own marketing network.
Comprehensive training and guidance: Organic farmers need to be given comprehensive training and guidance regarding the technical aspects of organic cultivation, financial management, and product marketing.
Increasing awareness of the importance of organic agriculture: It is necessary to make efforts to increase public awareness about the importance of organic agriculture for health and the environment, so that demand for organic products increases.

Conclusion

This study shows that the Bitra assisted program for organic agriculture in Lubuk Bayas Village has not shown a significant impact on the socio-economic improvement of farmers. Further efforts are needed to overcome the factors that hinder the progress of the assisted program and to ensure that this program can provide concrete benefits for organic farmers.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

Small sample size: The sample size used in this study is relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Limited data collection methods: The study relied on a limited number of data collection methods, including questionnaires, interviews, and observations.
Limited scope: The study focused on a specific village and district, which may not be representative of other areas.

Future Research Directions

Future research should aim to address the limitations of this study by:

Increasing the sample size: Future studies should aim to increase the sample size to improve the generalizability of the findings.
Using a more comprehensive data collection method: Future studies should use a more comprehensive data collection method, including surveys, interviews, and observations.
Expanding the scope: Future studies should aim to expand the scope of the study to include other areas and villages.

References

[List of references cited in the study]

Appendix

[Appendix containing additional information, such as raw data and tables]

Note: The above article is a rewritten version of the original content, with improvements in grammar, syntax, and formatting. The article is now more readable and easier to understand.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Comparative Analysis of Socio-Economic Levels Assured Bitra Farmers and Anorgani Farmers

Q: What is the main objective of this study?

A: The main objective of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the socio-economic levels of organic and inorganic farmers in Lubuk Bayas Village, Perbaungan District, Serdang Bedagai Regency, to identify the differences and similarities between the two groups.

Q: What is the significance of this study?

A: This study is significant because it provides valuable insights into the socio-economic levels of organic and inorganic farmers in Lubuk Bayas Village, which can inform policy and decision-making related to agricultural development and sustainable farming practices.

Q: What are the key findings of this study?

A: The key findings of this study are that there is no significant difference in the socio-economic level between organic and inorganic farmers, but the socio-economic level of organic farmers respondents is slightly higher than inorganic farmers due to a side job carried out by some organic farmers.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study include a small sample size, limited data collection methods, and a limited scope.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study?

A: The recommendations of this study include increasing the duration and intensity of the assisted program, developing market access, providing comprehensive training and guidance, and increasing awareness of the importance of organic agriculture.

Q: What are the implications of this study for policy and decision-making?

A: The implications of this study for policy and decision-making are that it highlights the need for more sustainable and effective support for organic farmers, including increasing the duration and intensity of the assisted program, developing market access, and providing comprehensive training and guidance.

Q: What are the future research directions of this study?

A: The future research directions of this study include increasing the sample size, using a more comprehensive data collection method, and expanding the scope of the study to include other areas and villages.

Q: What are the potential applications of this study?

A: The potential applications of this study include informing policy and decision-making related to agricultural development and sustainable farming practices, providing insights for farmers and agricultural extension services, and contributing to the development of more effective and sustainable agricultural support programs.

Q: What are the potential benefits of this study?

A: The potential benefits of this study include improving the socio-economic levels of organic farmers, increasing the adoption of sustainable farming practices, and contributing to the development of more effective and sustainable agricultural support programs.

Q: What are the potential challenges of this study?

A: The potential challenges of this study include addressing the limitations of the study, including the small sample size and limited data collection methods, and ensuring the generalizability of the findings.

Q: What are the potential contributions of this study?

A: The potential contributions of this study include providing valuable insights into the socio-economic levels of organic and inorganic farmers, informing policy and decision-making related to agricultural development and sustainable farming practices, and contributing to the development of more effective and sustainable agricultural support programs.

Q: What are the potential implications of this study for the environment?

A: The potential implications of this study for the environment are that it highlights the importance of sustainable farming practices and the need for more effective and sustainable agricultural support programs to promote environmental sustainability.

Q: What are the potential implications of this study for the economy?

A: The potential implications of this study for the economy are that it highlights the importance of sustainable farming practices and the need for more effective and sustainable agricultural support programs to promote economic sustainability.

Q: What are the potential implications of this study for society?

A: The potential implications of this study for society are that it highlights the importance of sustainable farming practices and the need for more effective and sustainable agricultural support programs to promote social sustainability.

Note: The above article is a Q&A article that provides answers to frequently asked questions about the comparative analysis of socio-economic levels assured Bitra farmers and anorgani farmers.