to strengthen the role of the DPRD in the initiation function

Oct 13, 2025 by sorusgentrification.com 5 views

Regional Executive and Legislative Legal Position in the Establishment of Regional Regulations: Revealing Overlapping Authority

Introduction

The establishment of regional regulations, also known as Perda, has been a crucial aspect of regional governance in Indonesia. The Law Number 32 of 2004 concerning Regional Government has brought significant changes in the mechanism of supervision of Perda. However, this change has also raised questions about the executive and legislative legal position of the region in the formation of a regulation. In this article, we will discuss the relationship between the Regional Government and the DPRD (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah) in the formation of regional regulations, and how this relationship can be improved to produce quality local regulations and beneficial to the community.

The Relationship Between Regional Government and DPRD in the Formation of Regional Regulations

Law Number 32 of 2004 emphasizes the partnership working relationship between the Regional Government and the DPRD in the formation of regional regulations. This partnership is reflected in the joint discussion of the draft Perda, as if to equalize the DPRD and the Regional Head in the field of legislation. However, this is contrary to Law Number 10 of 2004 concerning the Establishment of Legislation, which states that the discussion of the draft Perda in the DPRD is carried out with the Governor or Regent/Mayor. This situation gives rise to overlapping authority, and raises the question: Who actually holds control in the process of regional legislation?

The Dominance of Regional Heads in Regional Legislation

Further analysis shows that in practice, regional heads with their devices have dominance in regional legislation. This is caused by several factors:

Information, Expertise, and Resources: Local government has greater access to the information, expertise, and resources needed in the legislation process. This gives regional heads an advantage in determining the needs and priorities of the formation of the Regional Regulation.

*Initiative and Control: Regional heads generally have a stronger initiative in determining the needs and priorities of the formation of the Regional Regulation, as well as having greater control of the bureaucratic devices involved in the legislation process.

The Marginalization of DPRD in the Legislation Process

The role of the DPRD in the legislation process becomes marginalized, especially in the initiation function. This is because the DPRD tends to focus on the supervisory function, which is considered as a function of controlling the process of forming a regulation. The DPRD's role in the initiation function is crucial in determining the direction and priority of regional legislation. However, the current arrangement gives regional heads more control over the legislation process, which can lead to the marginalization of the DPRD.

Overcoming the Problem of Overlapping Authority

The solution to overcome this problem is to rearrange constitutional arrangements regarding the relationship between the DPRD and the Regional Head. This arrangement should avoid the dominance of one party and focus on harmonious cooperation to realize the optimal administration of regional government. In addition, it is necessary to strengthen the role of the DPRD in the initiation function, so as to make a more significant contribution in determining the direction and priority of regional legislation.

Strengthening the Role of DPRD in the Initiation Function

To strengthen the role of the DPRD in the initiation function, several steps can be taken:

Increasing the capacity of the DPRD in accessing relevant information and data, so that they can make informed decisions in the legislation process.
Increasing the active role of the DPRD in the process of analyzing and preparing the draft regulation, so that they can contribute more significantly to the legislation process.
Providing training and capacity building for DPRD members, so that they can develop their skills and knowledge in the legislation process.

Conclusion

The relationship between the Regional Government and the DPRD in the formation of regional regulations is crucial in producing quality local regulations and beneficial to the community. However, the current arrangement gives regional heads more control over the legislation process, which can lead to the marginalization of the DPRD. To overcome this problem, it is necessary to rearrange constitutional arrangements regarding the relationship between the DPRD and the Regional Head, and to strengthen the role of the DPRD in the initiation function. By doing so, the relationship between the executive and legislative regions in the formation of regulations can be more balanced and effective, and produce quality local regulations and beneficial to the community.

Recommendations

Based on the analysis, the following recommendations can be made:

Rearrange constitutional arrangements regarding the relationship between the DPRD and the Regional Head, to avoid the dominance of one party and focus on harmonious cooperation.
Strengthen the role of the DPRD in the initiation function, by increasing the capacity of the DPRD in accessing relevant information and data, and increasing the active role of the DPRD in the process of analyzing and preparing the draft regulation.
Provide training and capacity building for DPRD members, to develop their skills and knowledge in the legislation process.

Future Research Directions

Future research can focus on the following areas:

The impact of the rearrangement of constitutional arrangements on the relationship between the DPRD and the Regional Head.
The effectiveness of the strengthening of the role of the DPRD in the initiation function.
The role of civil society organizations in the legislation process.

By conducting further research in these areas, we can gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between the Regional Government and the DPRD in the formation of regional regulations, and identify ways to improve the legislation process to produce quality local regulations and beneficial to the community.
Frequently Asked Questions: Regional Executive and Legislative Legal Position in the Establishment of Regional Regulations

Q: What is the main issue with the current relationship between the Regional Government and the DPRD in the formation of regional regulations?

A: The main issue is that the current arrangement gives regional heads more control over the legislation process, which can lead to the marginalization of the DPRD. This is because the DPRD tends to focus on the supervisory function, which is considered as a function of controlling the process of forming a regulation.

Q: What are the factors that contribute to the dominance of regional heads in regional legislation?

A: The factors that contribute to the dominance of regional heads in regional legislation are:

Information, Expertise, and Resources: Local government has greater access to the information, expertise, and resources needed in the legislation process.
*Initiative and Control: Regional heads generally have a stronger initiative in determining the needs and priorities of the formation of the Regional Regulation, as well as having greater control of the bureaucratic devices involved in the legislation process.

Q: What is the role of the DPRD in the legislation process, and why is it marginalized?

A: The role of the DPRD in the legislation process is to participate in the discussion and approval of the draft regulation. However, the DPRD tends to focus on the supervisory function, which is considered as a function of controlling the process of forming a regulation. This leads to the marginalization of the DPRD in the initiation function.

Q: What are the consequences of the marginalization of the DPRD in the legislation process?

A: The consequences of the marginalization of the DPRD in the legislation process are:

Lack of representation: The DPRD may not have a say in the formation of the Regional Regulation, which can lead to a lack of representation of the interests of the community.
Ineffective legislation: The legislation process may not be effective, as the DPRD may not have the necessary information and expertise to participate in the process.
Conflict of interest: The regional head may have a conflict of interest, as they may prioritize their own interests over the interests of the community.

Q: What are the solutions to overcome the problem of overlapping authority between the Regional Government and the DPRD?

A: The solutions to overcome the problem of overlapping authority between the Regional Government and the DPRD are:

Rearrange constitutional arrangements: Rearrange the constitutional arrangements regarding the relationship between the DPRD and the Regional Head, to avoid the dominance of one party and focus on harmonious cooperation.
Strengthen the role of the DPRD: Strengthen the role of the DPRD in the initiation function, by increasing the capacity of the DPRD in accessing relevant information and data, and increasing the active role of the DPRD in the process of analyzing and preparing the draft regulation.

Q: What are the benefits of strengthening the role of the DPRD in the initiation function?

A: The benefits of strengthening the role of the DPRD in the initiation function are:

Increased representation: The DPRD will have a greater say in the formation of the Regional Regulation, which can lead to increased representation of the interests of the community.
Effective legislation: The legislation process will be more effective, as the DPRD will have the necessary information and expertise to participate in the process.
Conflict of interest: The regional head will be less likely to have a conflict of interest, as the DPRD will have a greater role in the legislation process.

Q: What are the next steps to strengthen the role of the DPRD in the initiation function?

A: The next steps to strengthen the role of the DPRD in the initiation function are:

Increase the capacity of the DPRD: Increase the capacity of the DPRD in accessing relevant information and data, and increase the active role of the DPRD in the process of analyzing and preparing the draft regulation.
Provide training and capacity building: Provide training and capacity building for DPRD members, to develop their skills and knowledge in the legislation process.
Establish a clear role for the DPRD: Establish a clear role for the DPRD in the legislation process, to ensure that they have a greater say in the formation of the Regional Regulation.