Types of Phrases Found in the Mina Tragedy Discourse Text

Oct 13, 2025 by sorusgentrification.com 9 views

Introduction

The Mina tragedy that occurred in 2015 in Saudi Arabia was a devastating event that affected pilgrims from all over the world. This tragedy not only resulted in the loss of many lives but also had a profound impact on the community, leading to a significant amount of discussion and analysis of the language and discourse surrounding the event. One crucial aspect of this analysis is the phrase, which is a combination of two or more words that convey a specific meaning and function in the context of communication. This research aims to explore the phrases contained in the Mina tragedy discourse text, with the goal of understanding how these phrases contribute to the formation of narration and meaning in the context of the tragedy.

Methodology

This study employs a descriptive analysis method with a library approach, which involves the use of existing literature and data to analyze the phrases found in the Mina tragedy discourse text. The researchers used the theory put forward by Imam Asrori (2004) and Mustafa Al-Ghulayaini to guide their analysis. The findings of this study show that there are 13 types of phrases found in the text of the discourse about the Mina tragedy.

Types of Phrases Found in the Mina Tragedy Discourse Text

The results of this analysis reveal that there are 13 types of phrases found in the Mina tragedy discourse text. The details of the number of these phrases are as follows:

Na'ti phrase: 24
Athf phrase: 19
Badaly phrase: 3
Zharfy's phrase: 4
Syibhul Zadah Phrases: 9
Manfi's phrase: 14
Syarty phrase: 6
Idhafi phrase: 40
Adady phrase: 8
Mauwshuly phrase: 2
Istitsna'i phrase: 1
Bayany phrase: 2
Nasky phrase: 9

Dominant Phrases in the Mina Tragedy Discourse Text

From the results of this analysis, it is clear that the Idhafi phrase dominates with the highest amount, which is 40. The Idhafi phrase is often used to explain the relationship between two elements in sentences, making it a crucial tool in conveying complex information related to the tragedy. The use of this phrase is particularly relevant in the context of the Mina tragedy, as it allows for a deeper understanding of the events that unfolded.

Significance of Na'ti and Manfi's Phrases

In addition to the Idhafi phrase, the Na'ti phrase and Manfi's phrase also play a significant role in the Mina tragedy discourse text. The Na'ti phrase is often used to provide further explanations or details about the object or subject being discussed. In the context of the tragedy, the use of this phrase may be related to efforts to describe the situation or experience of pilgrims at that time. On the other hand, Manfi's phrase is used to express the absence or definition, which can reflect the mood or community's reaction to the tragedy.

The Role of Phrases in the Mina Tragedy Discourse Text

This analysis shows that the use of phrases in the discourse of the Mina tragedy not only serves to convey information but also as a tool to express emotions and understand deeper social contexts. The diversity of phrases found in this study highlights the complexity of the language used in responding to a tragedy, as well as emphasizing the role of language as a medium to build a collective understanding of an event.

Conclusion

The analysis of the phrase in the text of the Mina tragedy discourse in the 2015 pilgrims in Saudi Arabia provides valuable insights into the language and discourse surrounding this tragic event. The findings of this study demonstrate the importance of phrase analysis in understanding human experience, especially in critical situations. The diversity of phrases found in this study shows how complex the language used in responding to a tragedy, as well as emphasizing the role of language as a medium to build a collective understanding of an event.

Recommendations for Future Research

This study provides a foundation for future research on the analysis of phrases in discourse texts. Future studies can build on this research by exploring the use of phrases in different contexts, such as in other tragic events or in everyday conversations. Additionally, researchers can investigate the role of phrases in shaping public opinion and influencing social attitudes.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. Firstly, the study is based on a limited dataset, which may not be representative of the broader population. Secondly, the study relies on a descriptive analysis method, which may not capture the nuances of the language used in the discourse text. Finally, the study does not explore the cultural and historical context of the Mina tragedy, which may be relevant to understanding the language and discourse surrounding the event.

Future Directions

Future research can build on this study by exploring the use of phrases in different contexts, such as in other tragic events or in everyday conversations. Additionally, researchers can investigate the role of phrases in shaping public opinion and influencing social attitudes. Furthermore, researchers can explore the cultural and historical context of the Mina tragedy, which may be relevant to understanding the language and discourse surrounding the event.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the phrase in the text of the Mina tragedy discourse in the 2015 pilgrims in Saudi Arabia. The findings of this study demonstrate the importance of phrase analysis in understanding human experience, especially in critical situations. The diversity of phrases found in this study highlights the complexity of the language used in responding to a tragedy, as well as emphasizing the role of language as a medium to build a collective understanding of an event.

Q: What is the significance of the Mina tragedy discourse text?

A: The Mina tragedy discourse text is significant because it provides a unique window into the language and discourse surrounding a tragic event. The analysis of this text can help us understand how people respond to and make sense of traumatic events, and how language is used to convey emotions, experiences, and social contexts.

Q: What is the purpose of this study?

A: The purpose of this study is to analyze the phrases found in the Mina tragedy discourse text and to understand how these phrases contribute to the formation of narration and meaning in the context of the tragedy. The study aims to provide insights into the language and discourse surrounding the Mina tragedy and to highlight the importance of phrase analysis in understanding human experience.

Q: What types of phrases were found in the Mina tragedy discourse text?

A: The study found 13 types of phrases in the Mina tragedy discourse text, including Na'ti phrase, Athf phrase, Badaly phrase, Zharfy's phrase, Syibhul Zadah Phrases, Manfi's phrase, Syarty phrase, Idhafi phrase, Adady phrase, Mauwshuly phrase, Istitsna'i phrase, Bayany phrase, and Nasky phrase.

Q: Which phrase dominated the Mina tragedy discourse text?

A: The Idhafi phrase dominated the Mina tragedy discourse text with the highest amount, which is 40. The Idhafi phrase is often used to explain the relationship between two elements in sentences, making it a crucial tool in conveying complex information related to the tragedy.

Q: What is the significance of Na'ti and Manfi's phrases in the Mina tragedy discourse text?

A: The Na'ti phrase and Manfi's phrase play a significant role in the Mina tragedy discourse text. The Na'ti phrase is often used to provide further explanations or details about the object or subject being discussed, while Manfi's phrase is used to express the absence or definition, which can reflect the mood or community's reaction to the tragedy.

Q: What are the implications of this study for understanding human experience?

A: This study highlights the importance of phrase analysis in understanding human experience, especially in critical situations. The diversity of phrases found in this study shows how complex the language used in responding to a tragedy, as well as emphasizing the role of language as a medium to build a collective understanding of an event.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. Firstly, the study is based on a limited dataset, which may not be representative of the broader population. Secondly, the study relies on a descriptive analysis method, which may not capture the nuances of the language used in the discourse text. Finally, the study does not explore the cultural and historical context of the Mina tragedy, which may be relevant to understanding the language and discourse surrounding the event.

Q: What are the future directions for this research?

A: Future research can build on this study by exploring the use of phrases in different contexts, such as in other tragic events or in everyday conversations. Additionally, researchers can investigate the role of phrases in shaping public opinion and influencing social attitudes. Furthermore, researchers can explore the cultural and historical context of the Mina tragedy, which may be relevant to understanding the language and discourse surrounding the event.

Q: What are the practical implications of this study?

A: The practical implications of this study are that it highlights the importance of language and discourse in understanding human experience, especially in critical situations. The study also emphasizes the role of language as a medium to build a collective understanding of an event. This can have practical implications for fields such as education, communication, and social work, where understanding language and discourse is crucial for effective communication and social interaction.

Q: What are the theoretical implications of this study?

A: The theoretical implications of this study are that it contributes to our understanding of the role of language and discourse in shaping human experience. The study highlights the importance of phrase analysis in understanding the complex language used in responding to a tragedy, and emphasizes the role of language as a medium to build a collective understanding of an event. This can have theoretical implications for fields such as linguistics, sociology, and psychology, where understanding language and discourse is crucial for understanding human behavior and social interaction.