Understanding State Root Sync Internal

Oct 13, 2025 by sorusgentrification.com 124 views

Describe the Feature Request

In the context of a blockchain protocol, the frequency of block proposals plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity and efficiency of the network. With the introduction of preconfirmation, particularly a whitelist-based solution, the number of block proposals is expected to decrease significantly, potentially occurring only once per epoch. However, the current setting of stateRootSyncInternal at 16 has a substantial impact on the processing time of withdrawals, which is a critical aspect of the protocol.

Understanding State Root Sync Internal

stateRootSyncInternal is a configuration parameter that determines the frequency at which the state root is synced internally within the protocol. This value is essential in controlling the processing time of withdrawals, as it affects the number of batches that need to be processed before a withdrawal is considered complete. The current value of 16 results in a significant delay, with a withdrawal taking approximately 6,144 seconds (1.7 hours) to process.

The Need for a Smaller Value

Given the potential benefits of preconfirmation and the associated decrease in block proposal frequency, it is essential to reassess the value of stateRootSyncInternal. By reducing this value, the protocol can achieve faster withdrawals, which is a critical aspect of maintaining user trust and satisfaction. For instance, setting stateRootSyncInternal to 2 would result in a processing time of approximately 8 minutes, while a value of 4 would lead to a processing time of around 16 minutes.

Comparison of Gas Usage per Batch

Before making any changes to the value of stateRootSyncInternal, it is essential to compare the gas usage per batch under the same configuration. This will provide valuable insights into the potential impact of reducing the value on the overall gas usage and, subsequently, the network's efficiency.

Current Configuration

The current configuration of stateRootSyncInternal at 16 is being maintained to facilitate a comparison of gas usage per batch. This will enable the development team to assess the potential benefits and drawbacks of reducing the value and make informed decisions about the optimal configuration.

Proposed Changes

Based on the analysis, the proposed changes to stateRootSyncInternal are as follows:

Set stateRootSyncInternal to 2 for faster withdrawals (approximately 8 minutes)
Set stateRootSyncInternal to 4 for a balance between processing time and gas usage (approximately 16 minutes)

Implementation Plan

To implement these changes, the following steps will be taken:

Compare gas usage per batch under the current configuration to establish a baseline.
Implement the proposed changes to stateRootSyncInternal and monitor the impact on gas usage and processing time.
Analyze the results and make adjustments as necessary to achieve the optimal configuration.

Conclusion

The proposed changes to stateRootSyncInternal aim to improve the efficiency and user experience of the protocol by reducing the processing time of withdrawals. By comparing gas usage per batch under the same configuration, the development team can make informed decisions about the optimal configuration and ensure a seamless transition to the new value.

Benefits of the Proposed Changes

The proposed changes to stateRootSyncInternal offer several benefits, including:

Faster withdrawals: By reducing the value of stateRootSyncInternal, the protocol can achieve faster withdrawals, which is a critical aspect of maintaining user trust and satisfaction.
Improved user experience: Faster withdrawals will enable users to access their funds more quickly, leading to a better overall experience.
Increased efficiency: By reducing the processing time of withdrawals, the protocol can increase its efficiency and reduce the burden on the network.

Potential Drawbacks

While the proposed changes offer several benefits, there are also potential drawbacks to consider:

Increased gas usage: Reducing the value of stateRootSyncInternal may lead to increased gas usage, which could negatively impact the network's efficiency.
Potential for errors: Changes to the configuration may introduce errors or unexpected behavior, which could negatively impact the protocol's stability.

Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

In this article, we will address some of the most frequently asked questions related to the proposed changes to stateRootSyncInternal.

Q: What is the current value of `stateRootSyncInternal`?

A: The current value of stateRootSyncInternal is 16.

Q: Why is the current value of `stateRootSyncInternal` being maintained?

A: The current value of stateRootSyncInternal is being maintained to facilitate a comparison of gas usage per batch under the same configuration.

Q: What are the proposed changes to `stateRootSyncInternal`?

A: The proposed changes to stateRootSyncInternal are to set the value to 2 for faster withdrawals (approximately 8 minutes) and to 4 for a balance between processing time and gas usage (approximately 16 minutes).

Q: Why are the proposed changes necessary?

A: The proposed changes are necessary to improve the efficiency and user experience of the protocol by reducing the processing time of withdrawals.

Q: What are the benefits of the proposed changes?

A: The benefits of the proposed changes include faster withdrawals, improved user experience, and increased efficiency.

Q: What are the potential drawbacks of the proposed changes?

A: The potential drawbacks of the proposed changes include increased gas usage and potential for errors.

Q: How will the proposed changes be implemented?

A: The proposed changes will be implemented by comparing gas usage per batch under the current configuration, implementing the proposed changes, and monitoring the impact on gas usage and processing time.

Q: What is the expected outcome of the proposed changes?

A: The expected outcome of the proposed changes is to improve the efficiency and user experience of the protocol by reducing the processing time of withdrawals.

Q: How will the proposed changes be monitored and evaluated?

A: The proposed changes will be monitored and evaluated by comparing gas usage per batch under the same configuration and analyzing the results to make adjustments as necessary.

Q: What is the timeline for implementing the proposed changes?

A: The timeline for implementing the proposed changes is not yet determined and will be dependent on the outcome of the comparison of gas usage per batch under the same configuration.

Q: Who will be responsible for implementing the proposed changes?

A: The development team will be responsible for implementing the proposed changes.

Q: How will the proposed changes be communicated to the community?

A: The proposed changes will be communicated to the community through regular updates and announcements.

Q: What is the expected impact of the proposed changes on the community?

A: The expected impact of the proposed changes on the community is to improve the efficiency and user experience of the protocol, leading to a better overall experience for users.

Q: How will the proposed changes be tested and validated?

A: The proposed changes will be tested and validated by comparing gas usage per batch under the same configuration and analyzing the results to ensure that the changes meet the expected outcomes.

Q: What is the expected outcome of the testing and validation process?

A: The expected outcome of the testing and validation process is to confirm that the proposed changes meet the expected outcomes and are ready for implementation.

Q: How will the proposed changes be rolled out to the community?

A: The proposed changes will be rolled out to the community through a series of updates and announcements, with clear instructions on how to implement the changes.

Q: What is the expected impact of the proposed changes on the community?

A: The expected impact of the proposed changes on the community is to improve the efficiency and user experience of the protocol, leading to a better overall experience for users.

Q: How will the proposed changes be maintained and updated?

A: The proposed changes will be maintained and updated through regular updates and announcements, with clear instructions on how to implement the changes.

Q: What is the expected outcome of the maintenance and update process?

A: The expected outcome of the maintenance and update process is to ensure that the proposed changes continue to meet the expected outcomes and are ready for future updates.

Q: How will the proposed changes be communicated to the community?

A: The proposed changes will be communicated to the community through regular updates and announcements.

Q: What is the expected impact of the proposed changes on the community?

A: The expected impact of the proposed changes on the community is to improve the efficiency and user experience of the protocol, leading to a better overall experience for users.